TN118 - Writable CD/DVD Media
| 118.1 | Summary |
| 118.2 | Types of Optical Media |
| 118.3 | Standards for Optical Media, DVD-R vs. DVD+R |
| 118.4 | CD Capacity |
| 118.5 | Media Brand/Quality |
| 118.6 | What to Buy |
118.1 Summary
The reliability, compatibility, and longevity of recordable CD and DVD
media varies a great deal. Using low quality or non-standard media risks
problems reading the discs in other computers and/or the ability to
recover the data in any computer after the media is old.
Choosing quality media with maximum compatibility is not expensive
compared to the value of the data and value of the time lost when the
disc is not readable.
118.2 Types of Optical Media
There are several categories of current optical media:
CD-ROM, DVD-ROM Not recordable. Read only. Manufactured with the data
molded onto the disc using a mechanical process.
Suitable only for high volume duplication.
CD-R, DVD-R, Write once, then read only. Organic dye coating on the
DVD+R disk permanently changes from transparent to opaque
when exposed to intense laser light. Data is written
sequentially like a tape drive.
CD-RW, DVD-RW, Rewritable (write, erase, re-write). Phase changing
DVD+RW metallic coating on the disk becomes more or less
reflective when exposed to various intensities of
laser light. Data is written sequentially like a tape
drive. Not as stable as the organic dye disks, used
only when rewritability is required.
DVD-RAM Read/write. Same phase change technology as DVD-R
except instead of writing sequentially like a DVD-R,
data can be written in random sectors like a hard
disk. Much less compatible with drives supporting
other CD and DVD formats, used only when random
write access is required.
DVD-R(A), or Variation of typical DVD-R media. Originally intended
Authoring for professional use, has devolved into an obscure
format supported by virtually no current recording
technology.
118.3 Standards for Optical Media, DVD-R vs. DVD+R
The standards for the CD-ROM, CD-R, and CD-RW were defined by Sony and
Phillips and published in a series referred to as the "Rainbow Books."
These standards are well understood and followed by most of the
industry.
The standards for DVD's are more convoluted. The DVD Forum
(http://www.dvdforum.org/), a large consortium of industry vendors
founded by the collective owners of the DVD intellectual property
rights, publishes the standards for DVD-ROM, DVD-R, DVD-RW, and DVD-RAM.
A competing consortium, the DVD+RW Alliance (http://www.dvdrw.com/)
published alternative standards called DVD+R and DVD+RW.
It is important to note that DVD-R and DVD+R are different formats from
different organizations and are NOT compatible with each other. The
DVD+RW Alliance claims their standard is technically superior, but in
reality it is about money. The DVD Forum has higher license fees and
more rigid certification standards, so it costs less to make DVD+R and
DVD+RW media. In this author's opinion the DVD+RW Alliance is not about
delivering better media, but all about delivering cheaper, less
compatible media.
DVD-R format has been in use since 1997, and has had a five-year lead on
DVD+R. While many computer drives can read both types, not all drives
can read the "plus" formats, but all can read the "dash" formats.
118.4 CD Capacity
For CD's, if you care about compatibility, the safest option is to stick
with the 74 minute (650 Megabyte) disc. The 80 minute (700 Meg) CD was
originally defined for a specialized product and while common today, may
not be supported by all CD drives. The 90 minute (800 meg) and 99 minute
(870 Meg) CDs are not defined in any standard and likely to have
significant compatibility problems.
118.5 Media Brand/Quality
Most brands of media the consumer can find for sale in the typical
office supply store are not actually manufactured by the brand name on
the package. Usually the brand name contracts the manufacture of the
media to any number of overseas companies. Further, the brands change
the manufacturer depending on who wins the next bid and can be quite
inconsistent over a period of time. IBM, HP, Memorex, Fuji, and Imation
are all brands that either outsource their manufacturing of media or
worse yet, just sell the use of their brand name to the highest bidder.
The quality of media varies widely from one manufacturer to the next.
Not all manufacturers have licensed the same intellectual property
rights. There at least three different organic dyes that can be used and
numerous variations in manufacturing techniques resulting in countless
permutations of media type and quality. Drive manufacturers do not test
their drives with the large variety of low-end media sold by discount
retailers, they test with high-end media from reputable vendors. Low
quality media will produce much less consistent results and have more
compatibility problems between drives.
Reputable media manufacturers include Taiyo Yuden, MAM-A (Mitsui), Sony,
Verbatim (Mitsubishi), Maxell (Hitachi) and TDK. Unfortunately, to
confuse everyone, all of the manufacturers except Taiyo Yuden and MAM-A
have also used their brand on lower quality products manufactured by
other companies so they can have a "low price point" product in the
market.
The actual manufacturer can be determined by using special software to
read the media ID code from an unrecorded disk.
http://www.dvdinfopro.com/
http://dvd.identifier.cdfreaks.com/
118.6 What to Buy
With the difficulty of determining quality from brand markings on most
products, the author finds it easier to stick with Taiyo Yuden or MAM-A
who seem to deliver consistent results. The following are part numbers
and URLs for purchase:
MAM-A Mitsui CD-R GOLD 74 min 52x
Super White for Color Thermal
Part# 40902
http://www.datamediastore.com/mam-a-gold-cd-r-40355.html
MAM-A Mitsui DVD-R GOLD Archival 4.7G 8X
Thermal printable / White EDGE-2-EDGE
Part# 83439
http://www.datamediastore.com/mam-a-gold-dvd-r-83439.html
Other distributors:
http://www.meritline.com/
http://www.supermediastore.com/
http://www.rima.com/
|